Well I've tried the new 3dmark and purely as eye candy its hard to swallow the 1-10fps range I got for most of it Still its always been that way with 3dmark. You -need- SLI to get a half decent fps. You also need a card that supports SM3 for some of the tests and one of them is even Nvidia only - due to ATI's deviation from Direct X specs. That left me with pretty much just the updated demos from the last 3DMark which was disappointing.

For what its worth I scored 2321 .. Details

i dont think i even wanna try lol

lol my 05 score is about 1500 so i dont even wanna try this!

I just did it and got 3714, thats at stock speeds mind, havent OC'ed yet

What does this say about mt Pc?

never done anything like this before with my system

You've not linked to the right page, copy the 'compare' url it gives you on that page.

dont you need the pro version to do that?

aye thats the bugger

and whats it tellin me?

That your computer is passed it's best and needs an upgrade?

thats what i thought - its not to bad tho is it?? Give it to me straight ive got my mum here holding my hand - I can take it

If it's plays BF2 fast enough for you, then it's not that bad.

But not runngin bf2 at at-least 1024x768 with all the goodies turned on is a crying shame.

i use to have them all cranked up - but toned it down a tad - still have the shadows and such on

I got 4895 atm but my mem is running under speed and i havent finished the o/c on my cpu yet so i should achieve over 5k no bother. I'll test again in a couple of weeks when everything's settled in.

Hmm got 4032 running at 2.4

Only a small increase really. Hopefully i can crank it up some more