| A kick in the nuts to sony |
Scrappy
Uber sex0r?
Posts: 1185
Rank: 
Joined: 07 Apr 04
|
|
12 January 2007 16:32
Edited by Scrappy on 12-Jan-07 at 16:32
|
 |
|
|
Mani
Editor
Posts: 6957
Rank: 
Joined: 01 Apr 04
|
|
12 January 2007 16:36
|
|
|
Yer saw it, th I prefer HD-DVD for many reason and now it's actually bigger than blu-ray as well.
So um, disk can carry a std dvd layer and work in normal dvd players, now is bigger, uses a MUCH better compression algorithm and has nothing to do with Sony and their idiotic, fascist anti-consumer DRM infestations , bonus.
I used to have a handle on life, but it broke.
|
Maz
gameSlave Bike Wrecker
Posts: 2093
Rank:
Joined: 13 Apr 04
|
|
12 January 2007 17:49
|
|
|
=D
I can see the future-
Sony - "Blue ray is liek better cos its liek BLUE RAY N IT has our shidazzle n is liek pewpew hax0r pr00f."
5yr old kid - "I hacked your DRM protection using notepad and im 5" *kicks sony in nuts* - *walks away laughing*
Nah, Seriously - HD-DVD is soo much better simply because sony have nothing to do with it.
Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything.
Issue the orders Sir, and I will storm Hell. |
Stan
Film Guru
Posts: 2696
Rank:
Joined: 16 Apr 04
|
|
15 January 2007 20:01
|
|
|
Sadly the trouble is that sony own alot of the companies that make DVDS and films, thus some films may never show up on hd-dvd.
|
Mani
Editor
Posts: 6957
Rank:
Joined: 01 Apr 04
|
|
15 January 2007 20:04
|
|
|
I used to have a handle on life, but it broke.
|
Stan
Film Guru
Posts: 2696
Rank:
Joined: 16 Apr 04
|
|
15 January 2007 20:15
|
|
|
Funnly enough I was going to mention about this in my post. I want to be able to watch what I want on my format, not what some head of sony says is moraly acceptable.
|
Mani
Editor
Posts: 6957
Rank:
Joined: 01 Apr 04
|
|
15 January 2007 20:17
|
|
|
DId you note the costs of duplication etc too?
Very cheap to make hd-dvd'd costs millions to setup blu-ray production lines, big nail in the coffin that.
I used to have a handle on life, but it broke.
|
| A kick in the nuts to sony |
