Login
register search gameSlave

sequals that are better than the original.
Stan

Film Guru

User Avatar
Posts: 2696
Rank:
Forum rank 5 out of 5
Joined: 16 Apr 04
02 May 2005 20:09 Reply (Quote this message)
I was in bed last night in lots of pain trying to think of things to take my mind off it. When it come to me, how many sequals can you name that are better than the original.
Here are a few i thougt up last night
Godfather part 2
Aliens [although its a different kinda film]
Terminator 2


Stan

Film Guru

User Avatar
Posts: 2696
Rank:
Forum rank 5 out of 5
Joined: 16 Apr 04
02 May 2005 20:18 Reply (Quote this message)
Empire strikes back !!!!!!
Better in every way to a new hope !


Mani

Editor

User Avatar
Posts: 6957
Rank:
Forum rank 5 out of 5
Joined: 01 Apr 04
02 May 2005 21:24  Edited by Mani on 02-May-05 at 23:34 Reply (Quote this message)
The delta appears to be accurate for the prequels too, they get steadily worse the futher back in time they go.

Which obviouslt means that the new movies get better as they go on, but as still nowhere near as good as the 1st 'real' Star Wars movie.



I used to have a handle on life, but it broke.
Jammin

gameSlave Tart

User Avatar
Posts: 2846
Rank:
Forum rank 5 out of 5
Joined: 19 May 04
03 May 2005 11:36 Reply (Quote this message)
Police Academy 7... Only joking

Dunno if this counts but the 3rd matrix was better than the second, which inturn both were ruled by the first? hmm that doesnt work actually...

I can't really think of any really, pretty standard: Sequel = Not as good as the original. Pretty good rule of thumb



Bring Back shoutbox!
Jobbie

Camp2Win

Posts: 73
Rank:
Forum rank 1 out of 5
Joined: 09 Mar 05
03 May 2005 12:46 Reply (Quote this message)
sequels better than the original, hmmmm

Blade 2
Xmen 2
Spiderman 2


to name a few, i thought all above better than the 1st ones


Felon

User Avatar
Posts: 2346
Rank:
Forum rank 5 out of 5
Joined: 03 Apr 04
03 May 2005 12:49 Reply (Quote this message)
xmen 2 yes.

As i said in irc last night, silence of the lambs better than manhunter ?

Madmax 2 better than the first ?



Atari 2600 1978-81 -|- ZX81 Spectrum 1982-84 -|- Commodore 64 1984-87 -|- Amiga 500 1988-91 -|- Sega Mega Drive 1992-94 -|- Atari Jaguar 1994-95 -|- Sony PS1/2 1995-04 -|- MS Xbox 2003-06 -|- Flawless 360 01/12/06 and counting.. 28 years gaming, man im old
Rob

Wannabe Dwarf

Posts: 204
Rank:
Forum rank 2 out of 5
Joined: 28 Jan 05
13 May 2005 12:03 Reply (Quote this message)
yeah but manhunter was better than red dragon


Abstract

User Avatar
Posts: 753
Rank:
Forum rank 3 out of 5
Joined: 05 Nov 04
30 June 2005 12:58 Reply (Quote this message)
The lord of the rings: two towers better then fellowship, and then ROTK better then TT.


Stan

Film Guru

User Avatar
Posts: 2696
Rank:
Forum rank 5 out of 5
Joined: 16 Apr 04
30 June 2005 17:07 Reply (Quote this message)
i dunno about that abs, i love fotr the most of the 3. But i did watch that before i read the books then i read the books before i watched the other 2 parts so imo they dont come close to the books or the first part. I just love the feel of felowship, the colours it uses everything. I was Bitterly let down by two towers, just not a patch on the book and a few dodgy parts to the film tbh, aragorn was meant to hold up his sword in two towers and make this powerful speach about how the orcs may take helms deep but not before aragorn kills them all. It was a truely moving speach that showed his character coming on that was tottaly left out of the film. I have watched the fellowship far more times than the other 2 put together, but at least these films are personal taste as they r all good. Unlike if say u said avp was better than alien or aliens


hobgoblin

User Avatar
Posts: 974
Rank:
Forum rank 3 out of 5
Joined: 29 Jun 05
30 June 2005 17:09 Reply (Quote this message)
lethal weapon films get progressively better imo
as do lotr
batman begins is better than all the previous ones
chronicles of riddick i think was betetr than pitch black
back to the future 2


Stan

Film Guru

User Avatar
Posts: 2696
Rank:
Forum rank 5 out of 5
Joined: 16 Apr 04
30 June 2005 17:22 Reply (Quote this message)
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
leathal weapon 4 is sooooooooooo bad, first is by far and way the best and each one getting worse. No4 is so bad they had to make jet li slow down his fighting cos he was kicking mel gibsons ass, no4 was more like a bunch of old friends getting together than a proper film, lost all the drama and the edge of the first 2 imo.
Batman begins u may have a point but the other batman films did have george clooney and val kilmer in, so not hard to better them.
I hated chronicles of riddick lost all the originalty of pitch black because they had a big budget, just turned into another summer blockbuster that was shite.
I like back to the future 2 but i prefer no1 cos its a classic and the young mum is in back to the future part 1 allot and i fancy her pants off


Stan

Film Guru

User Avatar
Posts: 2696
Rank:
Forum rank 5 out of 5
Joined: 16 Apr 04
30 June 2005 17:24 Reply (Quote this message)
Jobbie i preferd blade 1 to blade 2 myself.
But spiderman 2 defo far better than the original one and same for xmen !!!
Can u believe it the old git stopped camping long enough to see some films. I am impressed


sequals that are better than the original.
Forum Home \ Films, TV Series New Thread New Reply